Progressive Democrat Issue 249
The latest ad from VoteVets.com makes the connection some of us have been making for more than a decade now:
Whether to address climate change, to get our economy off our addiction to fossil fuels, a market dominated by foreign, often hostile nations (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela...), or simply to fight pollution and stimulate our local economies, we HAVE to bolster our alternative energy industry. And it has to come BOTH from the top and the bottom. Our government has to pass a sane energy policy. VoteVets.com has a petition going for you to sign to urge Congress to get on the ball doing this.
But you and I have to act as well. Whether you can cut down your driving or eat less meat. Or maybe you can start buying green energy for your home (easy and generally not much more expensive than the polluting energy you currently pay for). You can find a green energy program, usually through your existing energy company, by finding your state on this map. Joy and I have been doing this for years and our energy cost pay for 100% wind energy.
Or you can at a bare minimum do some carbon offsets. Two of the best programs are through Native Energy and Carbon Fund.
Between government programs and personal actions, we can...we HAVE to...address both our dependence on foreign oil from hostile nations AND global warming.
More action you can take this week is on the healthcare front. You can join Dr. Howard Dean and Senators Michael Bennet (CO), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Jeff Merkley (OR), and Sherrod Brown (OH) who have written the following letter to Senator Harry Reid:
Dear Leader Reid:
We respectfully ask that you bring for a vote before the full Senate a public health insurance option under budget reconciliation rules.
There are four fundamental reasons why we support this approach – its potential for billions of dollars in cost savings; the growing need to increase competition and lower costs for the consumer; the history of using reconciliation for significant pieces of health care legislation; and the continued public support for a public option.
A Public Option Is an Important Tool for Restoring Fiscal Discipline.
As Democrats, we pledged that the Senate health care reform package would address skyrocketing health care costs and relieve overburdened American families and small businesses from annual double-digit health care cost increases. And that it would do so without adding a dime to the national debt.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) determined that the Senate health reform bill is actually better than deficit neutral. It would reduce the deficit by over $130 billion in the first ten years and up to $1 trillion in the first 20 years.
These cost savings are an important start. But a strong public option can be the centerpiece of an even better package of cost saving measures. CBO estimated that various public option proposals in the House save at least $25 billion. Even $1 billion in savings would qualify it for consideration under reconciliation.
Put simply, including a strong public option is one of the best, most fiscally responsible ways to reform our health insurance system.
A Public Option Would Provide Americans with a Low-Cost Alternative and Improve Market Competitiveness.
A strong public option would create better competition in our health insurance markets. Many Americans have no or little real choice of health insurance provider. Far too often, it’s “take it or leave it” for families and small businesses. This lack of competition drives up costs and leaves private health insurance companies with little incentive to provide quality customer service.
A recent Health Care for America Now report on private insurance companies found that the largest five for-profit health insurance providers made $12 billion in profits last year, yet they actually dropped 2.7 million people from coverage. Private insurance – by gouging the public even during a severe economic recession – has shown it cannot function in the public’s interest without a public alternative. Americans have nowhere to turn. That is not healthy market competition, and it is not good for the public.
If families or individuals like their current coverage through a private insurance company, then they can keep that coverage. And in some markets where consumers have many alternatives, a public option may be less necessary. But many local markets have broken down, with only one or two insurance providers available to consumers. Each and every health insurance market should have real choices for consumers.
There is a history of using reconciliation for significant pieces of health care legislation.
There is substantial Senate precedent for using reconciliation to enact important health care policies. The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Medicare Advantage, and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), which actually contains the term ‘reconciliation’ in its title, were all enacted under reconciliation.
The American Enterprise Institute’s Norman Ornstein and Brookings’ Thomas Mann and Molly Reynolds jointly wrote, “Are Democrats making an egregious power grab by sidestepping the filibuster? Hardly.” They continued that the precedent for using reconciliation to enact major policy changes is “much more extensive . . . than Senate Republicans are willing to admit these days.”
There is strong public support for a public option, across party lines.
The overwhelming majority of Americans want a public option. The latest New York Times poll on this issue, in December, shows that despite the attacks of recent months Americans support the public option 59% to 29%. Support includes 80% of Democrats, 59% of Independents, and even 33% of Republicans.
Much of the public identifies a public option as the key component of health care reform -- and as the best thing we can do to stand up for regular people against big insurance companies. In fact, overall support for health care reform declined steadily as the public option was removed from reform legislation.
Although we strongly support the important reforms made by the Senate-passed health reform package, including a strong public option would improve both its substance and the public’s perception of it. The Senate has an obligation to reform our unworkable health insurance market -- both to reduce costs and to give consumers more choices. A strong public option is the best way to deliver on both of these goals, and we urge its consideration under reconciliation rules.
Michael Bennet (D-CO), U.S. Senator
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), U.S. Senator
Jeff Merkley (D-OR), U.S. Senator
Sherrod Brown (D-OH), U.S. Senator
You can join in their call for a Public Option by going here.
Some big news from Arkansas this week. Senator Blanche Lincoln, who in many ways defines the concept "DINO," is being challenged in a Democratic primary by the much less conservative (I am not convinced he is as progressive as some people portray him, but he's better than Blanche!), very popular Lt. Governor Bill Halter. Here is Bill Halter on the Rachel Maddow show:
There has been a great response to his candidacy. MoveOn.org raised over $250,000 in one day. Democracy for America and Daily Kos raised tons of money for him as well. Over the course of the week these progressive, grassroots efforts raised over a million dollars. The AFL-CIO rapidly endorsed Halter and promised something like $3 million dollars. So in almost a week Halter has come close to catching up with Blanche Lincoln in fundraising. And he JUST announced. Following this, EMILY's List decided to drop Blanche Lincoln from their list of women they support. If this keeps up, it will send a HUGE message to the Blue Dogs that they have to play ball with the progressives or risk serious challenge. Please chip in some money to send a message to all conservative Democrats that they had better watch out. I have a feeling if we pull together on this one we may very well win and winning will really help convince Congressional Dems they had better shape up.
Here is this week's newsletter:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Right Wing Love of Domestic Terrorism
Reviewing the Blatantly Obvious: A Reminder that Global Warming is all about Scientific Data
Scientific Consensus on Global Warming
NY State Focus: Harold Ford, jr. is no Hillary Clinton
Brooklyn Focus: The Gowanus Canal Designated a Superfund Site
Brooklyn, NY Focus
Manhattan, NY Focus
Queens, NY Focus
Bronx, NY Focus
Suffolk County, NY Focus
Rochester, NY Focus
New York 19th District Focus: Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, Rockland, and Westchester Counties
NEW YORK STATE FOCUS
Texas Focus: (CRITICAL!!!) Texas Board of Education
Austin/Travis County, TX Focus
Dallas County, TX Focus
Houston/Harris County, TX Focus
Texas 10th District Focus: Turn TX-10 Blue
Texas 21st District Focus: Turn TX-21 Blue
Silicon Valley Area, CA Focus
San Diego, CA Focus
Orange County, CA Focus
Sussex County, NJ Focus
Passaic County, NJ Focus
Warren County, NJ Focus
NEW JERSEY FOCUS
Charlottesville/Albemarle County, VA Foucus
Fredericksburg/Spotsylvania County, VA Focus
Hanover County, VA Focus
Atlanta, GA Focus
Fayette County, GA Focus
Coweta County, GA Focus
Lancaster Co. PA Focus
Iowa Focus: Can Populist Roxanne Conlin Beat Corporate Shill Chuck Grassley?
Michigan Focus: The Real Bart Stupak...it's not a pretty sight
NORTH CAROLINA FOCUS