.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Mole's Progressive Democrat

The Progressive Democrat Newsletter grew out of the frustration of the 2004 election. Originally intended for New York City progressives, its readership is now national. For anyone who wants to be alerted by email whenever this newsletter is updated (usually weekly), please send your email address and let me know what state you live in (so I can keep track of my readership).

Name:
Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States

I am a research biologist in NYC. Married with two kids living in Brooklyn.

Google
  • Help end world hunger
  • Saturday, September 02, 2006

    Progressive Democrat Issue 85: ABC TO AIR BUSH PROPOGANDA ON 9/11

    I don't know about you, but I am damned sick of the right wing nuts exploiting 9/11 for their own benefit. This year they plan to do it again and ABC is hosting it. From Truthout:

    Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts
    By William Rivers Pitt
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Wednesday 30 August 2006

    The fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks is less than two weeks away...ABC intends to mark the occasion in far more grand a fashion. Starting September 10th and ending September 11th, the network will show a miniseries titled "The Path to 9/11." According to reports from early screenings, the writer/producer of the miniseries, Cyrus Nowrasteh, has crafted a television polemic intended to blame the entire event on President Clinton.

    Nowrasteh, an outspoken conservative...spoke last year at the Liberty Film Festival, described by its founders as Hollywood's first conservative film festival. Govindini Murty, actress, writer, and co-director of the Liberty Film Festival, wrote a review of "The Path to 9/11" for the right-wing online news page FrontPageMag.com.

    In the review, Murty states, "'The Path to 9/11' is one of the best, most intelligent, most pro-American miniseries I've ever seen on TV, and conservatives should support it and promote it as vigorously as possible. This is the first Hollywood production I've seen that honestly depicts how the Clinton administration repeatedly bungled the capture of Osama bin Laden."

    FrontPageMag, it should be noted, held a symposium back in May to argue that the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which were never found despite being the main reason for invasion, were actually spirited out of Iraq by Russia on the eve of the 2003 attack...


    I mean these guys are absolutely disgusting. Let's remember some facts. The Taliban and al-Qaeda were formed with the help of money and arms sent to them by the Reagan and the elected Bush admnistrations. By contrast, Bill Clinton made efforts to kill bin Laden and stop al-Qaeda, though those efforts were attacked by the Republicans in Congress as simply being a distraction from Clinton's sexual affairs. While Gingrich and the Republicans salivated over Clinton's sex life, Clinton actually tried to stop the people who wanted to attack us.

    The outgoing Clinton administration tried so hard to warn the incoming Bush administration of the danger al-Qaeada posed, the Republicans accused Clinton of being "obsessed with al-Qaeda." Would that they had listened to Clinton's obsession! Instead, Bush ignored the explicit warning "Bin Laden determined to attack inside America" and went on an extended vacation. THAT is the road to 9/11. Republican incompetence and stupidity leading to nearly 3000 American civilian deaths.

    Yet ABC wants to air the right wing revisionism that it is all Clinton's fault? DAMN it! Are we to reward the idiots who got us into this and attack the one president who sought to stop al-Qaeda? No Republican prior to the 9/11 attacks ever tried to stop al-Qaeda. But Clinton did, over Republican opposition. And it took nearly 3000 deaths before the Republicans finally decided that they, too, had better be obsessed with al-Qaeda.

    Only they weren't. They still barely lift a finger to stop al-Qaeda and instead invaded Iraq, a nation that never had al-Qaeda ties under Saddam Hussein.

    Truthout gives the real story. From the same article:

    Roger Cressy, National Security Council senior director for counterterrorism in the period 1999-2001, responded to these allegations in an article for the Washington Times in 2003. "Mr. Clinton approved every request made of him by the CIA and the U.S. military involving using force against bin Laden and al-Qaeda," wrote Cressy. "...Confusing the American people with misinformation and distortions will not generate the support we need to come together as a nation and defeat our terrorist enemies."

    Measures taken by the Clinton administration to thwart international terrorism and bin Laden's network were historic, unprecedented and, sadly, not followed up on. Consider the steps offered by Clinton's 1996 omnibus anti-terror legislation, the pricetag for which stood at $1.097 billion. The following is a partial list of the initiatives offered by the Clinton anti-terrorism bill:

    * Screen Checked Baggage: $91.1 million
    * Screen Carry-On Baggage: $37.8 million
    * Passenger Profiling: $10 million
    * Screener Training: $5.3 million
    * Screen Passengers (portals) and Document Scanners: $1 million
    * Deploying Existing Technology to Inspect International Air Cargo: $31.4
    million
    * Provide Additional Air/Counterterrorism Security: $26.6 million
    * Explosives Detection Training: $1.8 million
    * Augment FAA Security Research: $20 million
    * Customs Service: Explosives and Radiation Detection Equipment at Ports: $2.2 million
    * Anti-Terrorism Assistance to Foreign Governments: $2 million
    * Capacity to Collect and Assemble Explosives Data: $2.1 million
    * Improve Domestic Intelligence: $38.9 million
    * Critical Incident Response Teams for Post-Blast Deployment: $7.2 million
    * Additional Security for Federal Facilities: $6.7 million
    * Firefighter/Emergency Services Financial Assistance: $2.7 million
    * Public Building and Museum Security: $7.3 million
    * Improve Technology to Prevent Nuclear Smuggling: $8 million
    * Critical Incident Response Facility: $2 million
    * Counter-Terrorism Fund: $35 million
    * Explosives Intelligence and Support Systems: $14.2 million
    * Office of Emergency Preparedness: $5.8 million

    The Clinton administration poured more than a billion dollars into counterterrorism activities across the entire spectrum of the intelligence community, into the protection of critical infrastructure, into massive federal stockpiling of antidotes and vaccines to prepare for a possible bioterror attack, into a reorganization of the intelligence community itself. Within the National Security Council, "threat meetings" were held three times a week to assess looming conspiracies. His National Security Advisor, Sandy Berger, prepared a voluminous dossier on al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, actively tracking them across the planet. Clinton raised the issue of terrorism in virtually every important speech he gave in the last three years of his tenure.

    Clinton's dire public warnings about the threat posed by terrorism, and the actions taken to thwart it, went completely unreported by the media, which was far more concerned with stained dresses and baseless Drudge Report rumors. When the administration did act militarily against bin Laden and his terrorist network, the actions were dismissed by partisans within the media and Congress as scandalous "wag the dog" tactics. The news networks actually broadcast clips of the movie "Wag the Dog" while reporting on his warnings, to accentuate the idea that everything the administration said was contrived fakery.

    In Congress, Clinton was thwarted by the reactionary conservative majority in virtually every attempt he made to pass legislation that would attack al-Qaeda and terrorism. His 1996 omnibus terror bill, which included many of the anti-terror measures we now take for granted after September 11, was withered almost to the point of uselessness by attacks from the right; Senators Jesse Helms and Trent Lott were openly dismissive of the threats Clinton spoke of.

    Specifically, Clinton wanted to attack the financial underpinnings of the al-Qaeda network by banning American companies and individuals from dealing with foreign banks and financial institutions that al-Qaeda was using for its money-laundering operations. Texas Senator Phil Gramm, chairman of the Banking Committee, gutted the portions of Clinton's bill dealing with this matter, calling them "totalitarian."

    In fact, Gramm was compelled to kill the bill because his most devoted patrons, the Enron Corporation and its criminal executives in Houston, were using those same terrorist financial networks to launder their own dirty money and rip off the Enron stockholders. It should also be noted that Gramm's wife, Wendy, sat on the Enron Board of Directors.


    THIS is what ABC should be reporting, not right wing lies that ignore the fact that Clinton did all he could to try and stop bin Laden and it has always been the Republicans that stood in his way.

    Feel free to Contact ABC and tell them what you think about their serving as a propoganda machine for the Republicans whose failures allowed 9/11 to happen.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home