.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Mole's Progressive Democrat

The Progressive Democrat Newsletter grew out of the frustration of the 2004 election. Originally intended for New York City progressives, its readership is now national. For anyone who wants to be alerted by email whenever this newsletter is updated (usually weekly), please send your email address and let me know what state you live in (so I can keep track of my readership).

Name:
Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States

I am a research biologist in NYC. Married with two kids living in Brooklyn.

Google
  • Help end world hunger
  • Saturday, August 04, 2007

    Progressive Democrat Issue 128: THOUGHTS

    The levees broke in New Orleans...and Bush claimed "no one could have predicted the levees would break."

    That was a lie. It was predictable AND predicted in clear terms in a report that was on his desk. He ignored it. Money was withheld from upgrading the levees. People died because Republicans cut the budget so they could boost Halliburton profits and cut taxes on the richest 1% of Americans.

    The Republicans have been cutting the budget for food inspections. The result: tainted products from China poisoning pets and quite possibly contaminating human food. Americans may have been poisoned because Republicans cut the budget so they could subsidize oil companies that charge us over $3/gallon for gas while making record-breaking profits.

    Republicans have been cutting regulations on pollution emissions, so we see mercury levels in our fish rise, more and more lakes and rivers are now closed to fishing and recreation, asthma rates are increasing...and the companies that pollute our environment (because WE are the ones who drink the contaminated water, eat the contaminated fish and breathe the contaminated air) make record profits while polluting our neighborhoods.

    And now Minnisota. A bridge that had CLEARLY become unsafe was ignored...until it collapsed. And there are many more bridges out there in the exact same state of neglect as the one in Minnisota.

    Neglect. That is the word. Neglect.

    The neglect of America. While we spend BILLIONS of dollars bogged down in a civil war in Iraq that really has nothing to do with American security, America itself is neglected. While Halliburton, Bechtel and Exxon/Mobil, whose CEOs are all close buddies of Cheney, make record profits, America's roads, levees, wetlands, lakes, rivers and bridges are all neglected. While taxes are cut for some of the richest men in the world, the rest of us suffer with America's neglected infrastructre.

    This is not accidental. It is the POLICY of the modern Republican party to neglect America. I have written about this before, but it bears repeating. The Republican party has a POLICY of neglecting America and we all suffer for it.

    Grover Norquist, one of the darlings of the extreme rightwing, Gingrich/Bush/McCain branch of the Republican party, once said, "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub." This statement has been the basis of Republican policy. Norquist went into more detail:

    "Cutting the government in half in one generation is both an ambitious and reasonable goal," Norquist stated in May 2000. "If we work hard we will accomplish this and more by 2025. Then the conservative movement can set a new goal. I have a recommendation: To cut government in half again by 2050"


    This is what happens when you drown government in the Norquist's bathtub: you put American lives at risk. Simple as that. Katrina was a very predictable consequence of the Republican Doctrine. The importation of contaminated food from China was a very predictable consequence of the Republican Doctrine. The collapse of the bridge in Minnisota was a very predictable consequence of the Republican Doctrine. And it won't end there. You weaken government until it can no longer do its job, and then shit like this happens. And will keep happening until we STOP SACRIFICING GOOD GOVERNMENT FOR HALLIBURTON PROFITS.

    The Republican Doctrine of neglecting America has been in full swing. Halliburton and Exxon prosper. Working class and middle class Americans suffer. It is as simple as that.

    Here is this week's newsletter:

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    CORRUPTION IN AMERICA: A Comprehensive List (from a reader)

    FOX NEWS, HOME DEPOT AND THE SIERRA CLUB

    ENERGY SOLUTIONS

    NEW YORK FOCUS

    FLORIDA FOCUS

    NEW JERSEY FOCUS

    CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT: A Comprehensive List

    This was sent by a reader. It is a list of all Congressional Reps and Senators and Governors, etc. who have been indicted, convicted, pled guilty or otherwise brought to the attention of the legal system due to corruption. It includes both Democrats and Republicans for fairness, but in all fairness, it is hard to find the Democrats because they are so buried in the list of corrupt Republicans.

    Keep this list. Anytime some right winger claims the Republican party is the party of values, pull this out and ask just what kind of values they mean. Thanks to Tammy for this little list of society sinners...

    Corruption count
    Since January 1, 2000. Federal level, Governor level, elected and appointed officials, aides etc.
    Please let me know of any errors.

    Convicted/Pled Guilty
    --------------
    Republican Governor George Ryan - 4/17/2006 racketeering and bribery - (76 people convicted)
    Republican Governor Bob Taft - 8/18/2005. 5 counts failure to report gifts from Lobbyists
    Republican Governor John Rowland - 12/24/2004 Bribery
    Republican Governor Sonny Perdue - Campaign ethics violations

    NH GOP Chair Chuck McGee - conspiricy to make harrasing phone calls to block people from voting.
    Republican Aide Allen Raymond
    Republican James Tobin (NE Regional Dir., Bush campaign) - 12/15/05 conspiracy to commit telephone harassment, aiding and abetting of telephone harassment
    Republican Charles McGee (Executive Director of the NH Republican State Committee )
    Republican Shaun Hansen. GOP Marketing aide - conspiracy to commit telephone harassment and aiding and abetting telephone harassment

    Republican Aide Scott Falwell - racketeering, mail fraud and obstruction of justice
    Republican Aide Alexandra Prokos - Perjury
    Republican Aide Jim Ellis - 13 counts of unlawful acceptance of a corporate political contribution, money laundering
    Republican Aide John Colyandro - money laundering
    Republican Brian Hicks - bribery
    Republican Chief of Staff Peter Ellef - Bribery
    Republican Roger G. Stillwell - Interior Department official - bribed by Abramoff

    Republican Lobbyist Jack Abramoff - defrauding of American Indian tribes and corruption of public officials
    Republican Tony Rudy (lobbyist and aide to Tom Delay) - conspiricy
    Republican Representative Bob Ney - Conspiricy to defraud the United States and making false statements
    Republican Neil Volz (lobbyist and aide to Bob Ney) - bribery and corruption
    Republican William Heaton(Bob Ney's chief of staff) - Conspiricy
    Republican Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham - conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud, wire fraud, and tax evasion

    Republican David Hossein Safavian. Lying, obstruction of Justice

    Democratic Senator Traficant - bribery and forcing his aides to perform chores

    Republican Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby - two counts of perjury, one of obstruction of justice, and one of making false statements to federal investigators
    Republican Tom Noe - Laundered money for the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign, theft, corruption, party chairman and Bush Pioneer fundraiser
    Republican Gov Ernie Fletcher - 13 aides indicted
    Republican Micheal Scanlon (lobbyist and aide to Tom DeLay) - bribery
    Deputy Secretary Steven Griles - bribery, perjury, obstrcting a congressional investigation.
    Republican Congressional aide Mark Zachares - bribery


    Confessed under grant of Immunity
    ---------------------------------
    Monica Goodling, White House liaison for Alberto Gonzales - Hired federal prosecuters based upon party affiliation.


    Indicted/Charged
    ----------------
    Republican Tom Delay - conspiring to violate Texas state election law, money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Reprimanded by House Ethics Committee
    Republican Lawrence Novak
    Republican Nathan Taylor
    Kyle "Dusty" Foggo (George W Bush's CIA Executive Director) - 30 wide-ranging counts of fraud, conspiracy,
    money laundering, leaking classified information.
    Republican Lurita Alexis Doan, Administrator of the General Services Administration - violations of the Hatch act.
    Democratic Senator William Jefferson - 16 counts of racketeering, soliciting bribes and money-laundering


    Under investigation
    ---------------------------
    Republican Senator Ben Stevens - bribery, corruption
    Republican Karl Rove - Abramoff, interfering in federal investigations, obstruction of justice
    Republican President George W. Bush - Abramoff, interfering in federal investigations, obstruction of justice
    Republican Vice President Dick Cheney - Abramoff, interfering in federal investigations, obstruction of justice
    Republican Governor and RNC Chairman Haley Barbour - Laundered money from foreign governments into presidential elections. Used non-profit organizations for illegal purposes. Perjury.
    Republican Representive Mark Foley - Pediphilia
    Republican Representive Mark Reynolds - Covered up for Mark Foley
    Republican Representive Dennis Hastert - Covered up for Mark Foley
    Republican Governor Mitt Romney - Made false statements to bondholders
    Republican Governor/Ex Representative Jim Gibbons - Bribery
    Republican Attorney General Gonzales - Fired US Attorneys for prosecuting Republicans, interfering in federal investigations, obstruction of justice, lying to Congress, perjury, witness tampering.
    Republican Paul J. McNulty - Deputy Attorney General. Interfering in federal investigations, obstruction of justice, lying to Congress, perjury
    Republican Senator Pete Domenici - Used influence to get a US Attorney fired
    Republican Representative Heather Wilson - Used influence to get a US Attorney fired
    Republican Representative Tom Feeney - bribery
    Republican Representative Richard George Renzi - bribery, conflict on interest.
    Republican Representative Jerry Lewis - Accepted gifts from Lobbyists, bribery, honest services fraud, dispensation of special favors
    Republican Representative John Doolittle - Accepted money from Jack Abramoff in exchange for favors.
    Democratic Representative Alan Mollohan -May have funnelled money to his own home-state foundations
    Republican Representative Rick Renzi - bribery, sponsored legislation that dealt hundreds of millions of dollars to his father’s business
    Republican Representative Tim Murphy - Ethics violations regarding use of Congressional staff for campaign purposes.
    Republican Representative Gary Miller - Illegal land deals, tax fraud
    Republican Representative Ken Calvert - Steered federal money to projects near his private real estate developments.
    Republican Representative Don Young - bribery

    Implicated - May be under investigation
    ---------------------------------------
    Richard Shelby (REPUBLICAN SENATOR - AL)
    Robert Riley (REPUBLICAN GOVENOR- AL)
    J. D. Hayworth (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - AZ)
    Dana Rohrabacher (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CA)
    Doug Ose (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CA)
    Richard Pombo (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CA)
    John Doolittle (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CA)
    Ed Royce (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CA)
    Scott McInnis (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CO)
    Rob Simmons (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - CT)
    Tom Feeney (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - FL)
    Ric Keller (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - FL)
    John Isakson (REPUBLICAN SENATOR - GA)
    Saxby Chambliss (REPUBLICAN SENATOR - CA)
    Jack Kingston (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - GA)
    Michael Simpson (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - ID)
    Butch Otter (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - ID)
    Jerry Walker (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - IL)
    Dan Burton (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - IN)
    Charles Grassley (REPUBLICAN SENATOR - IA)
    BOB EHRLICH (REPUBLICAN GOVENOR- MD)
    Dave Camp (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - MI)
    Gil Gutknecht (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - MN)
    Christopher Bind (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- MO)
    Jim Talent (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- MO)
    Charles Pickering (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - MS)
    Roger Wicker (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - MS)
    Thad Cochran (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- MS)
    Dennis Rehberg (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- MT)
    Jon Christensen (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NE)
    John Ensign (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NV)
    Roger Wicker (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - MS)
    Jim Saxton (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NJ)
    Frank LoBiondo (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NJ)
    Mike Ferguson (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NJ)
    Heather Wilson (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NM)
    Charles Taylor (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NC)
    Walter Jones (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NC)
    Jean Schmidt (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - OH)
    Ralph Regula (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - OH)
    Ernest Istook (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - OK)
    James Inhofe (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- OK)
    Tom Coburn (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - OK)
    Gordon Smith (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- OR)
    Arlen Specter (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- PA)
    Curt Weldon (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - PA)
    Joe Pitts (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - PA)
    John Thune (REPUBLICAN SENATOR - SD)
    Bill Janklow (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - SD)
    Van Hilleary (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - TN)
    Chris Cannon (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- UT)
    Eric Canter (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - VA)
    Randy Forbes (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - VA)
    George Allen (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- VA)
    Tom Davis (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - VA)
    George Nethercutt (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WA)
    Doc Hastings (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WA)
    Dave Reichert (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WA)
    Mark Green (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WI)
    Paul Ryan (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WI)
    Shelly Moore Capito (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WV)
    Mike Enzi (REPUBLICAN SENATOR- WY)
    Barbara Cubin (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - WY)
    Robert Riley (REPUBLICAN GOVENOR - AL)
    Marilyn Musgrave (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE- CO)
    Jim Nussle (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - IA)
    Matt Blunt (REPUBLICAN GOVENTOR- MO)
    Roy Blunt (REPUBLICAN MAJORITY LEADER - MO)
    Jon Christensen (FORMER REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE- NE)
    Jeb Bradley (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - NH)
    John E Sununu (REPUBLICAN SENATOR - NH)
    Jean Schmidt (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - OH)
    Joe Wilson(REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - SC)
    Gresham Barrett (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - SC)
    Henry Brown (REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE - SC)

    Convicted: 102 Republicans. 1 Democrat
    Indicted: 5 Republicans. 1 Democrats
    Confessed under grant of Immunity: 1 Republican. 0 Democrats.
    Under investigation: 21 Republicans. 1 Democrat.
    implicated: 75 Republicans. 0 Democrats
    Total: 204 Republicans. 3 Democrats.

    FOX NEWS, HOME DEPOT AND THE SIERRA CLUB

    Last week I discussed the fight between Fox News and Daily Kos. This battle is expanding.

    One Bill O'Reilly advertiser, Home Depot, has been defending its choice to keep advertising on a show that advocates violence, uses anti-gay, anti-black and anti-Semitic rhetoric, and generally tells lies on a routine basis.

    The Defense by Home Depot, as reported by some on Daily Kos who received replies, was that the campaign against Bill O'Reilly's advertisers was threatening Home Depot's green initiatives. Yep...that is what they said. Somehow they were threatening to stop their green initiatives (which required considerable pressure from progressives to force them to start in the first place) if we questioned their advertising on a show filled with hate speech.

    To me that is the stupidest excuse I have ever heard.

    Let's for one moment review some facts. You can find a whole catalog of Bill O'Reilly hate speech here. Some Key Bill O'Reilly quotes from our public airwaves:

    But I'll tell you what. I've talked to the commanders, and they tell me, look, you deploy us down there [the Mexican border], we stop the drug traffic dead, we stop it dead, all right. They're not even going to try.

    We'd save lives because Mexican wetbacks, whatever you want to call them, the coyotes -- they're not going to do what they're doing now, all right, so people aren't going to die in the desert.


    Yep..."Mexican wetbacks."

    And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead.


    Yep...Blow up San Francisco. That is what he calls patriotism.

    But do you understand what the New York Times wants, and the far-left want? They want to break down the white, Christian, male power structure, which you're a part, and so am I, and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically break down the structure that we have. In that regard, Pat Buchanan is right.


    Defending the "white, Christian, male power structure" along with Buchanan.

    And, not included in the catalog that I could see, was telling a Jewish caller (an American citizen) he should "move to Israel" if he didn't like combining Christianity and American government.

    And the list goes on. You can read even more on Media Matters.org. And here is a discussion of a recent show where Billy managed to be offensive to both "Mexicans" and gays.

    THIS is what Home Depot is supporting with its advertising money.

    The Sierra Club, perhaps irritated by Home Depot's claims that the anti-O'Reilly push will threaten Home Depot's green initiatives (that they were forced to undertake), has joined the campaign against O'Reilly. This comes from their website:

    Tell Home Depot to Stop Supporting Fox News

    Make a call to Chair and CEO of The Home Depot Francis Blake's Office. Phone: (770) 433-8211

    Make a call to Vice President for Environmental Innovation, Home Depot Ron Jarvis's Office. Phone: (770) 384-4835

    Make a call to Chief Financial Officer of The Home Depot Carol Tomé's Office. Phone: (770) 433-8211

    Note: To reach CEO Francis Blake's office, you will need to press 0# and then verbally request to talk to him.

    The following is just suggested language. You can use your own words if you wish.

    Hi, this is [YOUR NAME] calling from [CITY, STATE].

    Right now, Home Depot is telling us consumers that it supports the environment and that it is fighting global warming.

    I am very concerned, however, that you are running ads on Fox News—an avidly anti-environment program. Through misinformation, Fox is delaying our efforts to solve the world’s biggest environmental problem, global warming.

    Fox denies that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, argues that climate change is “a hoax,” and refutes widely-accepted scientific findings about the problem. One Fox commentator even argued that trees cause more pollution than cars.

    The biggest thing Home Depot can do to help the environment is promote truth and science on global warming.

    I urge you to pull your ads from Fox as soon as possible. Global warming is an urgent problem and there’s no time to waste with misinformation.

    If the Home Depot is serious about protecting the environment, it must stop advertising on Fox.

    Thank you.

    ENERGY SOLUTIONS: To Nuke or Not to Nuke

    Recently I had a painful exchange with a few reasonable nuke advocates and a whole slew of arrogant nuke shills over at Daily Gotham. The message from both the reasonable and rabid was: we are all going to die unless we embrace nuclear energy NOW! NOW NOW! Some of them were quite nasty in delivering this message, denegrating renewables in the process. Others were more reasonable and calm in delivering their message.

    I think they are wrong, at least in the almost worshipful, faith-based way they speak of nuke energy, and the disdainful, pitying way they discuss renewables. They seem about 20 years behind in what is happening in the renewables field, and they take the worst case scenarios when dicussing renewables and the best case when discussing nukes. And they claim some kind of special scientific experise...some have even called me scientifically illiterate. Well, those who know me know how dumb that accusation is, so I don't feel the need to address it. But what I do want to address, once again, is what SCIENTISTS are saying about solving global warming in the SCIENTIFIC journals. To me this is what matters when it comes to making decisions about our future.

    The last time America had any kind of real concerted push for renewable energy was during the Carter Administration. Since Reagan, we have either taken great steps backwards as a society, or we have had piecemeal attempts to encourage change. But basically we have remained addicted to fossil fuels and that is a horrible, horrible thing for America. It puts us at the mercy of fundamentalist nations, pollutes our cities and has been a big chunk of what is causing global warming, since America alone contributes about 25% of greenhouse gasses (though China and India are growing alarmingly in their contributions).

    Had we listened to Jimmy Carter, we'd still have a problem, but we'd be far closer to handling it.

    But we didn't. So we have, according to the more optimistic estimates, about 10 years to mitigate global warming's effect on our society. Now some of us have been advocating for action for 20 years, so to be at the point where we have to say "I told you so, why the FUCK didn't you listen" might be nice if it wasn't for the fact that I look in my son's eyes and know that whatever we do from now, his life will be much harder than it needed to be because our generations failed and our leaders failed.

    Sometimes it is hard to look my son in the eye when I realize we are still having to fight for the changes that Carter tried to lead us into.

    Now, there are still global warming deniers out there, fools that they are. I am not talking to them. I can refer them to hundreds, if not thousands of diaries, including this statement from the Union of Concerned Scientists, this statement by a military think tank, and this diary I wrote addressing the Denial Lobby. I will also add this from an abstract from the most recent issue of the scientific journal Nature where the author indicates the overwhelming evidence for human-caused changes in the climate and adds to our knowledge (go to Nature to see the whole article with references. It is a subscription site, but you can find it at most university science libraries): (referencing left in intentionally)

    Human influence on climate has been detected in surface air temperature1, 2, 3, 4, 5, sea level pressure6, free atmospheric temperature7, tropopause height8 and ocean heat content9. Human-induced changes have not, however, previously been detected in precipitation at the global scale10, 11, 12, partly because changes in precipitation in different regions cancel each other out and thereby reduce the strength of the global average signal13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19...We show that anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on observed changes in average precipitation within latitudinal bands, and that these changes cannot be explained by internal climate variability or natural forcing. We estimate that anthropogenic forcing contributed significantly to observed increases in precipitation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes, drying in the Northern Hemisphere subtropics and tropics, and moistening in the Southern Hemisphere subtropics and deep tropics. The observed changes, which are larger than estimated from model simulations, may have already had significant effects on ecosystems, agriculture and human health in regions that are sensitive to changes in precipitation, such as the Sahel.


    Enough with the Denial Lobby. They are idiots and it is just a shame that the Republican Party listens to so many idiots.

    Now, on to solutions.

    I have been reading about global warming and possible solutions for about 20 years now. Coincidentally, I have been a scientist for a similar amount of time, counting my first entry into a lab at Salk Institute, San Diego, where I worked on regulation of bacterial genes. For those who know about such things, I found that the spacing between the "negative 35 promoter region" and the CRP element in the LacZ gene affected expression of the gene such that both distance and geometry of the DNA were important. Back in 1995, during my first post-doc, I remember reading an issue of Scientific American discussing energy in America. Two things were highlighted above all else: increased efficiency and wind power. The potentials of these two things were powerful even in 1995. All other ways of dealing with global warming (and remember, much of the scientific community had already accepted global warming back then!) were still fairly speculative in 1995. But energy efficiency was a HUGE open opportunity to save both energy and money, while the wind potential of the Great Plains states alone could have, even back then, helped to make us energy independent. That was 1995. One can only assume that we have advanced since then, Bush Administration denials to the contrary.

    And discussions I have had with people who have worked with farmers and wind energy tell me that the potential even outside the Great Plains is pretty good, though certain not perfect. Farmers are slowly adopting wind generation as a major part of their income, given that it is extremely hard for small farmers to make a living just growing food. Wind energy helps American farmers, could help our manufacturing sector, and helps provide both jobs and energy for America. And yet I have heard nuke shills call wind power mere "tinkertoys." Well, Scientific American (back in 1995) and American farmers have more respect for wind energy than the nuke shills.

    The Feb. 9th 2007 issue of science largely starts from the exact same place Scientific American left off in 1995: energy efficiency and wind power are here and now with other technologies being more speculative. Both push nuclear energy a little, but with caveats that seem even stronger in 2007 than in 2005. The main differences between then and now are a.) the weight of scientific consensus about the need to cut carbon emissions is greater, and b.) the focus on solar energy and biomass is greater now than it was then. And nuclear, though still mentioned, seems to be considered less of an option now than then.

    Here is a summary of the issue of Science in the issue’s introduction:

    Lewis (p. 798) points out that the direct conversion of sunlight with solar cells, either into electricity or hydrogen, faces cost hurdles independent of their intrinsic efficiency. Ways must be found to lower production costs and design better conversion and storage systems. In the short term, utilization of biomass relies mainly on sugar fermentation; Goldemberg (p. 808) discusses how Brazil's use of ethanol from sugarcane has greatly reduced its need for imported oil. Many long-term goals have been set for biomass utilization; for example, the European Union (EU) hopes to produce a quarter of its transportation fuels from biomass by 2030, as discussed by Himmel et al. (p. 804). Better ways are also needed for processing the available sugars, and conversion to higher alcohols or even alkanes is desirable. Stephanopoulos (p. 801) explores the options afforded by reengineering biosynthetic pathways in microbes.

    How we tackle energy problems will turn on a number of policy issues. Potocbrevenik (p. 810) discusses how the EU is setting targets and allocating funding for alternative energy. Finally, Schrag (p. 812) explores the feasibility of sequestering carbon dioxide from fossil-fuel use and our technological readiness and willingness to implement such schemes.

    The News section profiles national lab directors, computer modelers, captains of industry, and bench scientists who are writing the early chapters of the next book on energy research. Some of them are developing better plants to grow as fuel or ways to convert them into ethanol. Others are developing catalysts to extract hydrogen from water or generate electricity from hydrogen. What they all share is a desire to find new ways to power the future.


    The main reason we have done so little since, say, 1995, is that there has been little political will to push for alternatives. Wind energy, a way the Great Plains states could be energy exporters and American farms can make extra money, has only recently started picking up in the US. Had we started in 1995, the influence of Saudi Arabia could have been greatly reduced, American farmers would be in a better financial situation, and the economy of the Great Plains states might be booming. This has been a huge missed opportunity. Though the nuke shills may still refer to wind as "tinkertoys."

    But wind is not featured much in the Feb. issue of Science. It is too much today’s technology, what we should have started pushing 10 years ago. In essence, it is seen as a given. Scientists are, of course, more interested in the future.

    One of the most striking things mentioned in this issue of Science is a graph of the energy flow in the US from production to usage. Slightly more than 50% of energy produced in the US is wasted. Now NOTHING is ever 100% efficient, so energy efficiency cannot double our output even if half of our energy we produce is wasted. But clearly this is one place we can make some real, meaningful changes. And possibly save money in the process. The article that shows this graph mostly discusses the long-term, large scale challenges we face if we are going to mitigate global warming, but for me this diagram was the most dramatic part of the article.

    Nuclear is only covered in two articles, one proposing a new, supposedly “safe” nuclear technology based on thorium. This is a proposal focused on Norway since Norway has one of the world's largest reserves of thorium. The idea seems to be considering developing an altogether new technology. This new technology would not use enough fuel to sustain a chain reaction, thus eliminating the worst dangers of nuclear power: the Chernobyls and TMIs we have faced in the past. Waste is “expected to be low,” but exactly how low and what could be done with it is not discussed. What is interesting is that nuke shills keep telling us that nuke power is absolutely safe...so why does this article, aimed at scientists, still talking about making things safe? Suggests that the current technology is not as safe as nuke shills are telling us. Honestly, I just wish nuke advocates would be up front about these things. Nuke may have a role, maybe even a strong role, to play in getting beyond fossil fuels, particularly in places like India and China that are not going to be as concerned with green energy so much as fueling their economy as rapidly as possible. But the fact that the shills and advocates seem to distort the truth compared to what I read in Scientific American and Science and Nature really makes me wonder what else they are hiding.

    Solar is covered in a few articles, including a new technology using a gallium arsenide-based solar cell developed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado and being used in the Negev desert in Israel. It is estimated that this technology, if used on a large enough scale, can reach 40% efficiency at converting sunlight to electricity and can achieve what is considered the magic number of $1000 per kilowatt of electrical capacity that would be needed to make solar competitive. Another article suggests a technology that could cut the cost of producing solar cells by as much as 75% using a modification traditional silicon based technology.

    Many articles cover biofuels. One article covers the intersection of agriculture and energy, how farmers can make money growing the fuel for biofuels. It is proposed that small farms could produce crops such as the grass Miscanthus for local biorefineries, which would produce local energy. I should note wind power already provides a way in which small farmers, but placing turbines on part of their farms, can make more money than if they grow only crops. This is partly because of the very unfair way in which crops are purchased by large agribusiness, providing farmers with almost no profit. But it also indicates that there really is a good market for locally-produced wind energy.

    Other articles discuss the use of genetically engineered microbes and plants to produce biofuels more efficiently. “Genetic engineering” is a term that worries many, and there are dangers that require regulation. But genetic engineering is not inherently dangerous and if proper regulation is in place it is a powerful technology. Genetic engineering is part of what I have been doing for 20 years. But when it is done on a large scale, as in agriculture, safety measures must be in place to prevent environmental spread of the genetically engineered organism. If this is done, the potentials described for boosting biofuels could be enormous.

    This is simply a brief overview of SOME of what is covered in this excellent issue. I recommend going to your local University science library and tracking it down. It is a rich source of information on the current scientific thinking regarding energy issues.

    BBC news has a recent article on IPCC recommendations for global warming solutions. Remember, IPCC represents a large number of our best scientists and is privy to the cutting edge science.

    Some excerpts:

    The growth in greenhouse gas emissions can be curbed at reasonable cost, experts at a major UN climate change conference in Bangkok have agreed.

    Boosting renewable energy, reducing deforestation and improving energy efficiency can all help, they said.


    For the record, renewables, forests and efficiency are what I have been pushing for years. Some past articles I wrote include this on forests, this on light bulbs, and this rather controversial one on reforestation. But that is just a sampling.

    Back to the BBC article:

    Many technologies can play a role in cutting emissions, the IPCC says; but it singles out the building sector as a potential major contributor, and energy efficiency as something that "plays a key role across many scenarios for most regions and timescales".

    Nuclear power and carbon capture and storage, where emissions from fossil fuel power stations are captured and buried underground, could play important roles; but with nuclear, "safety, weapons, proliferation and waste remain as constraints".


    Now, here is where some nuke advocates will jump in: nuke "COULD play" an important role. Except they would change it to "MUST" play an important role. I suspect it is somewhere in the middle. I suspect that it will have to play some role, hopefully not too large, but again India and China will likely take the nuke options. I will also note that scientists are still bringing up all those pesky safety, security and waste issues that nuke advocates and shills try to tell us are all solved and we don't have to worry our pretty heads about. Again, I wish they would just be honest about the risks. Scientists are! By not admitting the risks and limitations, nuke advocates are doing us AND themselves a disservice.

    The article ends with a quote from a representative from Friends of the Earth UK:

    "By introducing measures and investment that will stimulate sustainable renewable energies and energy efficiency, governments can help to achieve cuts in global emissions by 50% by 2050. Without this, we face devastating consequences."


    A version of the IPCC report aimed at policy makers can be found here. In it, BOTH nuclear AND renewables are presented as part of the solution. Many of the nuke advocates say "sure, we support renewables" but then they don't give it any place in their stated plans, instead giving the lion's share to nuke and denigrating renewables as near useless. But this isn't really how the IPCC report reads to me. Nuke and renewables seem to both be given solid roles in what we need to do. Energy efficiency is given a MUCH larger role than nuke advocates seem to give it, at least when they discuss details. Some statements that nuke advocates would downplay in their obsession include:

    It is often more cost-effective to invest in end-use energy efficiency improvement than in increasing energy supply to satisfy demand for energy services. Efficiency improvement has a positive effect on energy security, local and regional air pollution abatement, and employment...

    Renewable energy generally has a positive effect on energy security, employment and on air quality. Given costs relative to other supply options, renewable electricity, which accounted for 18% of the electricity supply in 2005, can have a 30-35% share of the total electricity supply in 2030 at carbon prices up to 50 US$/tCO2-eq ...

    Climate change policies related to energy efficiency and renewable energy are often economically beneficial, improve energy security and reduce local pollutant 35 emissions. Other energy supply mitigation options can be designed to also achieve sustainable development benefits such as avoided displacement of local populations, job creation, and health benefits...


    "Renewable energy" (for immediate implementation) is defined in the report as including "hydropower, solar, wind, geothermal and bioenergy." Renewables for implementation by 2030 are defined as including "tidal and waves energy, concentrating solar, and solar PV."

    Among the things the nuke shills do is lump together all bioenergy under biofuels, applying all problems with biofuels (which are avoidable if care is taken) to other forms of bioenergy, like biomass. They also assume all forms of tidal (which often I hear used to include wave) is the same, which it is not.

    So scientists approach this problem the same way I do. Start with forests (preservation and reforestation and management), alternative energy (using a broad approach including renewables as much as possible and nuke as needed, keeping in mind the limitations and dangers) and energy efficiency (perhaps the FIRST priority since it can be implemented faster and to more effect in the near term, though the other methods are also critical). Carbon sequestration is controversial and seems like a half-assed solution, but has to be considered if needed. Nuke shills approach it by dismissing renewables altogether, calling them "bioFools" and "tinker toys," showing their lack of understanding of the approach scientists are taking, and saying ONLY nukes can save us. Nuke advocates are more reasonable, but even they relegate forests, efficiency and renewables to a tiny part of the solution and gush over how nukes will be 90% of the solution. Don't be fooled. They may well be right in recognizing that nuke energy, particularly when you think of global solutions, will be a likely PART of the solution. But don't let them tell you it has to take the lion's share of our attention and money. Be open to nuke power because it may be a necessary evil. But don't let them tell you the bulk of what scientists are telling us to do is just "tinker toys." If they tell you that, they are either lying or ignorant.

    For some more info, I recommend the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) website, though nuke advocates say they exaggerate the risks of nuke power.

    UCS on Clean Energy

    UCS on Global Warming solutions

    UCS on what YOU Can do

    And, the page nuke advocates disagree with, UCS on nuclear safety.

    And for those who want something they can do right now:

    FIRST: just switch to compact fluorescent bulbs! The light may not be perfect, but it saves gobs of energy AND money. Our energy bill went down by one third when we switched. It really works!

    SECOND: Lobby banks and financial institutions to STOP INVESTING IN COAL POWER PLANTS! Urge them to start investing in the future, not the past. Go here for this action alert.

    You can also help through organizations like Trees, Water, People. Do carbon offsets through Native Energy (this is what both Al Gore and Democracy for America do).

    If you have your favorite action you want to tell us about, please put it in the comments.

    NEW YORK FOCUS

    UPCOMING EVENT:
    New Democratic Majority, Brooklyn Presents:

    DIVERSE NYC SEMINAR SERIES: With Mohammed “Moe” Razvi

    Thursday August 9th
    7 PM
    Ozzie's Coffee Shop
    5th Ave. and Garfield Place
    Park Slope, Brooklyn

    New Democratic Majority is a Progressive grassroots organization working to return the Democratic Party to its populist roots and restore common sense to American politics.

    The Diverse NYC series disucsses the experiences and issues of out diverse neighborhoods. We will kick off with Mohammed “Moe” Razvi, Executive Director for the Council of Pakistani Organizations and founder of COPO (Council of People's Organization), a community service organization Mr. Razvi set up after the 9/11 attacks to help unite our community.

    Come join your hosts, Michael Bouldin, Marjorie Gersten and David Michaelson, for a discussion with Moe Razvi

    FLORIDA FOCUS

    What would you do if your Congressman came to you personally to ask for your help? What if the help he asked you for was to help design a program to rig an election?

    If you're Clint Curtis you go public with the scandal and run for Congress against him.

    Clint Curtis grew up Republican in Illinois and Florida. It took the recent Republican scandals and the realization that his Republican Congressman wanted to rig elections to bring Clint Curtis to the realization that the Party that calls itself Republican had long ago abandoned the values it once professed. In this Clint is coming to the same realization that Jim Jeffords came to when to switched to Independent, that Arianna Huffington came to after watching her idol, Newt Gingrich, show his true colors, and that Pete McClosky came to when he switched his party affiliation to Democrat...after a lifetime of being a Republican including a candidate for President in a primary against Nixon. Clint describes his own change this way:

    In September of 2000, Clint’s life took a course that he never could have imagined. It was then that Clint was first introduced to Tom Feeney the incoming Speaker of the Florida House. Clint was a programmer at Yang Enterprises, a company whose owner was an associate and confidant of Mr. Feeney. Initially Clint was impressed. He expected that Mr Feeney shared the values of the Republicans he knew growing up in Illinois. Clint identified with the Republican values at the time - conservative and based on ethics and integrity. It was always the Democrats under Mayor Daley that were engaged in corrupt behavior. Clint expected that Mr. Feeney would share those values. Clint soon learned he did not.

    As he sat in on meetings between the owner and Mr. Feeney, Clint quickly discovered that Mr. Feeney was the most corrupt and unethical person he had ever met. Tom Feeney is the poster boy for political corruption. In a fairly early meeting Mr. Feeney requested a prototype program that would allow for elections to be invisibly rigged. Clint delivered the program to the owner believing the prototype was to be used to prevent election fraud. That was until the owner informed him that it was to be used to “control the vote in South Florida.”

    In subsequent meetings Feeney continued to discuss unethical and illegal aspirations. Clint resigned from the company and moved to Tallahassee. After confirming the illegal activity on the part of his former company and Tom Feeney (including espionage activity), he notified the proper authorities.


    Clint now combines both traditionally conservative and traditionally progressive values in a way that may seem unusual today, but that President Theodore Roosevelt might find familiar. Verfied Voting and fighting corruption are Clint's primary issues in his run for Congress in FL-24, but you can read his stand on many issues here. To me he comes off level-headed and reasonable in a way that Democrats, Independents and moderate Republicans can relate to.

    A local Brooklyn activist, Marjorie Gersten, has met him and worked with him on voting issues and was impressed with him. I came to be interested in the FL-24 race because the incumbent, Amraboff Republican Tom Feeney, is typical of the modern Republican culture of Corruption that is plaguing America today and that American voters so soundly rejected in 2006. Clint Curtis is ready to take on Tom Freeny and bring the issues of fair voting and clean government to the attention of the public.

    From Clint's Campaign:

    Clint Curtis - Leadership for a Change

    Save the Date:

    August 31st Launch to Victory in ’08 Celebration for Clint Curtis for US Congress. It will be a great day for celebrating and a training to get us ready to Win! (See the announcements below) Save the date and come and enjoy the music by Milt Farrow, delicious food and inspiring speakers. Speakers so far are: Janie Holman President of Women’s Club of Central Brevard; Candidate for President of Democratic Women’s Club of the State of Florida, Luis Cuevas, Florida State Coordinator for PDA, Steve Williams, Business Manager IBEW Local 756. Luis Cuevas and Shelley Parker Florida State Coordinators of the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) will run a training called Motivating and Organizing Precincts. Let’s learn how to get precincts excited about getting out the vote and let’s enjoy being with fellow Democrats on August 31st. The Clint Curtis for US Congress Campaign Bus will be bringing guests to the Launch. See below for details.

    Grassroots Growing Deeper

    Our Grassroots Organization is growing in strength and depth. Jerry Halberg has joined the team as our Field Manager. Jerry has spent many years running successful campaigns for the Teamsters Union. Young Democrats have joined our team and are adding energy and talents with their BLOGGING and web skills. Milt Farrow has taken on Strategic Research and Policy Coordinator, Tyler Weissman is Events Coordinator, Charlie Wiggins is our Union Liaison. If you would be interested in joining the core Victory Team, we have organizational opportunities for you to share your talents and make a real difference. Let me know your interest. Martyward@rcn.com . We will be looking to have 45 support team members in each county ready, willing and able to help canvass, phone bank, sign wave, data entry and enjoying being a part of a winning team. Let me know what you would like to do. Contact me at 954-732-1112.


    Fund Raising

    We have a goal to raise $250,000 by the FEC filing date of Sept 30th. We need to show the DCCC that Clint is the best candidate. For them only money talks. Clint has been Dialing for Dollars most every day. Money has begun to flow. Your contribution to reach our goal is most welcome. Go to http://www.actblue.com/page/clintcurtis . We don’t want the DCCC to put up a bobble head primary candidate who will just promise the world and not deliver. We must do better. Our country is at stake! We need someone who will stand up for us and do what is right for America, right for your best interest. Clint Curtis is that candidate. District 24 is one of the three top targeted seats in the country. We have the best candidate to give Feeney the boot. We need your help more than ever. With a good showing now, the coffers of the moneyed donors will open to the campaign and the press will take note. Having the press will be a big advantage. Clint’s message will get out and District 24 turn Blue.

    The first 250 people to give $100 will receive a Victory Circle Pin to commemorate your commitment to new leadership and bringing us to our goal of $250,000 by Sept 30th. Be one of the first to receive this collector’s pin. http://www.actblue.com/page/clintcurtis. If you would rather give $10, $15, $25 or more by the month so we can budget our funds and know just when we can send out a mailer, print our palm cards, or produce an ad go to www.clintcurtis.com and click on the Victory Circle. Every dollar counts. All contributions are gratefully received.

    We have the team. We have the determination. We have the candidate – Clint Curtis Leadership for a Change. With your help we will have the money. http://www.actblue.com/page/clintcurtis.


    Netroots – Yearly Kos Convention

    Our Netroots are vital to our success. We so appreciate all the BLOGGING you do. Spreading the word about Clint and doing Action Alerts to Congress and letters to the editor has been fabulous. We need team members skilled in the Netroots of it all to link us with new BLOOGERS, Facebook, and YouTube. Please Join our Netroots Team for the Campaign and get us more connected martyward@rcn.com . Clint will be at the Yearly Kos Convention in Chicago this Thursday and Friday. Look him up if you are there. Contact him via email clintcurtis@clintcurtis.com .

    Thank you for all you do. Thank you for continuing to work to make a real difference in America. Together we can do it! Marty Check out our updated website www.clintcurtis.com

    Thursday Aug 2nd 7:00 – 9:00 PM
    Victory Team Meeting


    Be a part of the core Victory Team. Join the meeting via Conference Call this Thursday. Lots of exciting plans in the works. Call 712-432-2600 Put in Access Code: 64224

    Saturday Aug 4th 11:00 – 3:00 PM
    3rd Annual Red White and Blue Picnic sponsored by the Volusia County Democratic Clubs


    Bethune Park, Daytona Beach . Clint will be speaking so come and join us for day of Democratic fellowship. $15 for adults and students $5 and children free.


    Friday August 31st, 2007 4-6 PM
    Orientation and Training by the PDA


    Clint Curtis for Congress Campaign will hold an exciting Orientation and Training called Motivating and Organizing Precincts into Action August 31st between 4 – 6 PM at the Winter Springs Civic Center at 400 N Edgmond Ave Winter Springs, Florida. The training will be conducted by Florida State Coordinators of the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA). Everyone is welcome. Suggested donation $10.

    Please RSVP by Aug 29th by contacting Marty Ward at martyward@rcn.com 954-0732-1112 or 321-267-6818

    Friday August 31st, 2007 7- 9 PM
    Launch to Victory in ’08 Celebration


    Join in the Launch to Victory in ’08 Celebration for Clint Curtis for US Congress. Come meet with Clint and enjoy the music, food and speakers. We will be celebrating August 31 at the Winter Springs Civic Center on 400 N Edgmond Ave Winter Springs, Florida. Everyone is welcome and bring a friend. If you would like a ride to the Celebration, hop on the Clint Curtis for Congress Campaign Bus. The bus will leave the Brevard Democratic Headquarters 1261 Kings Hwy (Rt 520) Cocoa at 5:15 PM. Seating is limited so call early.

    Please RSVP by Aug 29th by contacting Marty Ward at martyward@rcn.com 954-732-1112 or 321-267-6818

    We have a Victory Circle Pin that will be given to the first 250 people who donate $100 to the campaign. Be one of the first to receive your collector’s item and know you made a difference. www.clintcurtis.com

    NEW JERSEY FOCUS

    This comes from Democrats 2000:


    RUN FOR OFFICE:
    Democrats 2000 is accepting applications from young candidates seeking office in November for inclusion on the 2007 'Recommended List'.

    Placement on the "Recommended List" offers candidates access to New Jersey's largest network of young professional Democrats while raising crucial dollars for their campaigns during their final weeks. "Recommended" candidates also are featured on the Democrats 2000 website and have been the subject of several stories in newspapers and other publications across the state.

    If you are under 40 and running for office as a Democrat this November you are encouraged to apply for placement on this year's list. Deadline for applications in August 31. Go here to ask about applying.


    GET A JOB: (Help Wanted)

    Congressman Bill Pascrell is searching for a highly-motivated, detail-oriented staff assistant with excellent written and oral communication skills. Responsibilities include general reception duty, processing correspondence, addressing constituent matters, staffing events and otherwise assisting the Congressman and district staff in all functions of the office. Candidates require a valid driver’s license. Salary commensurate with experience.

    Assemblyman Bob Gordon i ssearching for a Director of Constituent Services/Legislative Aide. This person will work to solve constituent problems, oversee constituent mail, conduct legislative research and staff public events with the Assemblyman. Experience in NJ government a plus. Entry level salary and great benefits. Excellent writing skills required.

    For more information about this position, or to find out how you can apply, contact us today.

    UPCOMING EVENT:
    Thursday, August 16, 6:00 p.m.
    Middlesex County Democratic Organization Happy Hour
    Sponsored By Democrats 2000.
    Old Bay, New Brunswick
    Ticket Price: $50
    RSVP HERE