Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez: Please Support a Strong Public Option

Over at Daily Kos they have a round up of which Congressional reps are supporting, leaning towards supporting, or uncommitted/leaning against a strong public option for healthcare reform.

A Congresswoman I respect, Nydia Velazquez, is in the uncommitted/leaning against category. I would like to ask Nydia to please join her many colleagues in supporting a strong public option.

What does this mean?

From the Congressional Progressive Caucus (via the Daily Kos article):

The Congressional Progressive Caucus calls for a robust public option that must:

* Enact concurrently with other significant expansions of coverage and must not be conditioned on private industry actions.
* Consist of one entity, operated by the federal government, which sets policies and bears the risk for paying medical claims to keep administrative costs low and provide a higher standard of care.
* Be available to all individuals and employers across the nation without limitation
* Allow patients to have access to their choice of doctors and other providers that meet defined participation standards, similar to the traditional Medicare model, promote the medical home model, and eliminate lifetime caps on benefits.
* Have the ability to structure the provider rates to promote quality care, primary care, prevention, chronic care management, and good public health.
* Utilize the existing infrastructure of successful public programs like Medicare in order to maintain transparency and consumer protections for administering processes including payment systems, claims and appeals.
* Establish or negotiate rates with pharmaceutical companies, durable medical equipment providers, and other providers to achieve the lowest prices for consumers.
* Receive a level of subsidy and support that is no less than that received by private plans.
* Ensure premiums must be priced at the lowest levels possible, not tied to the rates of private insurance plans.

In conclusion, the public plan, like all other qualified plans, must redress historical disparities in underrepresented communities. It must provide a standard package of comprehensive benefits including dental, vision, mental health and prescription drug coverage with no pre-existing condition exclusions. It must limit cost-sharing so that there are no barriers to care, and incorporate up-to-date best practice models to improve quality and lower costs. All plans, including the public plan, must include coverage for evidence-based preventive health services at minimal or no co-pay. All plans, including the public plan, should be at least as transparent as traditional Medicare.

Bouldin previously linked to Nadler's piece supporting the public option that also gives a good arguement. Also, 75% of Americans support a public option.

The Congress Critters already committed to this include (among others), my own Congresswoman, Yvette Clarke, as well as others I am proud to have supported in the past: Keith Ellison, Dennis Kucinich (supported him in his recent re-election, not for President), Eric Massa, Jerry Nadler, Maxine Waters, Diane Watson, Linda Sanchez, Mike Honda, and John Hall. I would ask Nydia Velazquez to join these other Congress Critters in supporting the public option.

I also urge people to contact their Congress Critters to urge them to support the public option as well.