.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Mole's Progressive Democrat

The Progressive Democrat Newsletter grew out of the frustration of the 2004 election. Originally intended for New York City progressives, its readership is now national. For anyone who wants to be alerted by email whenever this newsletter is updated (usually weekly), please send your email address and let me know what state you live in (so I can keep track of my readership).

Name:
Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States

I am a research biologist in NYC. Married with two kids living in Brooklyn.

Google
  • Help end world hunger
  • Saturday, September 15, 2007

    Progressive Democrat Issue 134: Thoughts

    Another 9/11 passes and we are still way off in the wrong direction. It depresses me each and every year. Just think of what might have been! Had election 2000 not been stolen, the world would be so different.

    Bush and Osama bin Laden both tried exploiting 9/11 for their own propoganda this year. Both failed miserably. But we are still stuck in the Iraq quagmire and al-Qaeda is stronger than ever. Even as the Republican party slips further into disarray with even Idaho and Kansas Senate seats looking weak for the Republicans, we still can't get the ball rolling on the most critical issues facing our nation: impeachment, withdrawal from Iraq, fair and honest elections, energy independence and mitigating global warming. The Democrats in Congress have made considerable strides in reversing the horrible Republican agenda, but are still lagging on these key issues. Impeachment and withdrawal AT LEAST are now being discussed, something that was impossible while the Republicans were in charge. But we are still mired in Iraq for no good reason and we still do not have an independent investigation of the Bush/Cheney Administration. Fair and honest elections are being tentatively explored, a nice reversal (mostly) from the attempts by Republicans to make elections LESS fair and LESS honest. But we still see elections threatened all over the country...including good old Florida, the state that got us into this mess in the first place. We have taken several steps closer to a sound energy policy and a sound policy on global warming, but the progress might be too slow to make a difference if we don't hurry it up.

    Six years after 9/11 we still have a long, long way to go. Which is why we have to keep fighting. We know 2006 was the turning point. But a turning point isn't victory. Let's hope 2008 can be the year we really make the definitive difference.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS:

    REMEMBERING 9/11

    FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE WINNING

    THE ARTICLES THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE #5

    NY STATE FOCUS: NY-25

    CALIFORNIA FOCUS: Preserving our elections

    MINNESOTA FOCUS: Al Franken on Energy Policy

    Remembering 9/11



    Mr. Bush...what part of "Osama bin Laden determined to attack the US" didn't you understand?



    And why haven't you stopped al-Qaeda and caught bin Laden? Six years after Pearl Harbor we had won. Decisively. Six years after Pearl Harbor Hitler was dead and many of those responsible for atrocities brought to justice. Six years after 9/11, where is Osama bin Laden?



    Imagine leaving home in the morning, voting in a primary election for mayor, catching the subway to work and starting your day. Imagine hearing strange noises, but thinking nothing of them. Then imagine hearing that the WTC was no more and desperately trying to reuinte your family, now scattered across a city in crisis with no subways running. That was six years ago.

    Six years ago today, I was sitting in the same place, the NYU medical center (though a different part of the building). It was here in the NYU medical center that I heard the planes hit the WTC and wondered what those sounds were. It sounded like exactly like a semi-truck going too fast down the highway and hitting some bumps...that is what the 9/11 attacks sounded like. I looked up both times I heard that noise, looked out over the FDR highway and East River of NYC, saw nothing but the usual traffic, thought nothing more about it. It was only much later that I realized I had heard the planes hit.

    My wife was under the WTC in the subway when the first plane hit. She knows this because the people who got on the next stop were in shock, in tears...they had just seen it happen. Not on TV, not hearing it second or third hand. They had just seen a jumbo jet slam into the WTC...live. My wife was among the first to know it happened because she heard about it from witnesses who were getting the hell out of there.

    Six years ago today, I was trapped on Manhattan, with no route back to my home in Brooklyn. My daughter was at school back in Brooklyn. My wife and I were stuck in Manhattan all day. The streets of Manhattan pretty much shut down. Wave after wave of emergency vehicles barrelled downtown along the FDR highway...but few other cars were on any of the streets. Wave after wave of tired, shocked people walkied doggedly uptown along all the other streets. No one knew where they were going, they were just getting away from the disaster, moving uptown, wondering where was safe...wondering how to get home. We all needed to get away but didn't know where to go. We had no idea when or where the next attack would come. We were trapped on what was clearly a giant terrorist target.

    I remember my co-worker never made it in that day. She had said goodbye to her husband and, uncharicteristicly, gone back to sleep. She awoke to images on TV of a plane hitting the exact spot where her husband worked. I called her repeatedly that day.

    "Have you heard from him yet?"

    "No."

    "Don't worry. Everyone is getting out. He'll make it."

    That was the first call. By the end of the day it was...

    "Have you heard from him yet?"

    "No..."

    Then lame silence because we both knew that anyone who could get out was out. She had long ago realized that her husband was dead. Though it was a year later that they recovered a piece of him large enough to confirm his death.

    Imagine kissing your husband goodbye, falling back to sleep, then waking up to that? Imagine having dinner with someone the night before, then slowly realizing the next day that he worked right where that plane hit.

    People were wonderful. People handed water out to strangers. People talked to everyone, comforted everyone. We were united in adversity and tears. We already knew that most firestations had lost as many as half their numbers. We knew that the New York firefighters had just shown America and the world what true heroism was. New Yorkers were fearful, confused...but proud and united.

    Six years ago today, my wife and I met up at my work. Since I worked at a medical center, we figured there would be emergency power, food, water, etc. at my work area should the worst happen. We had no idea what was coming next and it seemed like a medical center would be one of the safest places. How bad would things get? We had no idea.

    Soon after we met the subways started running again. Late in the afternoon we finally escaped to our home.

    It was early evening when we started walking from the train station in Brooklyn to pick up our daughter. We were directly under the smoke plume in our neighborhood. Six years ago today, the ashes of the WTC and those who died therein, fell on my skin on on my neighborhood. We realized at the time just what was hitting our skin and it was one of the strangest moments in our lives. Touching the ashes of all that...

    Already America was starting to lash out at Muslims. But not in my neighborhood. My family chose that night to eat out at a Muslim owned restaurant in our neighborhood. It was full.

    Soon after the invasion of Afghanistan (perhaps the only sane policy decision Bush ever made), my wife and I chose to eat at a local Afghan restaurant. It was empty. We asked the somewhat aloof owner how business was. He caught our sympathetic tone. He looked at us in despair and just said "Terrible." I am happy to say that business is still around six years later, having survived that terrible period.

    I am not sure if I was a New Yorker before 9/11. I was afterwards. You can't go through that with a whole city full of people without becoming part of that city.

    I write about this every year...and every year the frustration grows. Bush had been warned that it would happen but did nothing. Clinton had told him over and over again to watch out for bin Laden, and Bush did nothing. Why is Bush, the incompetent idiot who ignored direct warnings of the attacks, still in the White House?

    Every year the frustration grows. Why is bin Laden still free? Why is al-Qaeda stronger than ever (according to our own government's intelligence reports)? Why is terrorism getting worse worldwide (according to Bush's own State Department)? What are we doing in Iraq? Why are we picking fights with Iran?

    Every year the frustration grows. Why are firefighters who fought for America on 9/11 still dying with inadequate healthcare from the government? Why didn't mayor Giuliani, governor Pataki or Bush find some way to give the firefighters the equipment they needed so they could safely serve America? Why didn't Giuliani give the firefighters the proper equipment in the first place? Why have the Republicans cut so much funding to our first responders?

    Every year the frustration grows. Why are our troops fighting the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time? Why didn't Bush give our troops the equipment they needed from the start? Why did the Republicans cut benefits to Veterans even as they started this massive war?

    Every year the frustration grows, but what is worse this year than ever is the realization that Bush and Osama bin Laden are playing disgustingly similar games using disgustingly similar lies.

    I recently wrote about the current march to war by belligerent and fanatical Bush and belliegerent and fanatical Iran as a crusade/jihad moment that could screw all of us. Bush and the Iranian president both view the world in a similarly extremist view where Holy War justfies all in its wake. For those of us who are just trying to get by and make the world better, this kind of fanaticism is disastrous.

    But it strikes me that there is much more shared by Bush, along with his Republican supporters like McCain, Huckabee, Romney and Brownback, and fanatical Islamicists of all stripes. And the 6th anniversary of 9/11 shows clearly these similarities.

    The White House is releasing its white washed report on the McCain/Bush/Lieberman surge as its memorial to 9/11.

    Osama bin Laden is releasing his latest hate-video as his memorial to 9/11.

    For both Osama bin Laden and the Republican Party, 9/11 is nothing but a further call to arms, a further call to Jihad or Crusade. For both Osama bin Laden and the Republican Party, the anniversary of 9/11 is little more than an opportunity to link the Iraq war with 9/11, a factually incorrect link that BOTH Bush AND Osama want you to make.

    For Bush, the illegality, immorality and failure of the Iraq quagmire disappear if you make the false assumption that it has anything to do with 9/11. For Osama bin Laden, the disgusting barbarity and immorality of his 9/11 attack on the US disappear if you make the false assumption that Bush's illegal and immoral Iraq war somehow justifies in retrospect the 9/11 attacks.

    For Bush's hardcore followers, mainly Fox News addicts...and Lieberman, Iraq somehow IS connected to 9/11. Even though there is not one single fact to back that assumption, many of them DO make that assumption and use it to justify a Crusade against all of Islam. Bush and the hardcore Republican Fox News addicts (and Lieberman) also link Iran to the 9/11 attacks, even though there is not one single fact to support that assumption. The TRUTH is that if you were to pick the three most mutually hostile Islamic groups around today, they would be Iraq under Hussein, Iran and al-Qaeda. The three represent vastly different Muslim ideologies that are mutually antagonistic. A true Machiavellian would have played the three off eachother to their mutual detrement. Instead, Bush has picked a fight with all three, tried to link all three, and in the process he has destroyed Iraq as a secular mililyary dictatorship and allowed it to split into two main rival factions: pro-Iranian Shi'ites, and Sunnis increasingly sympathetic to al-Qaeda. By ignoring facts and pursuing a fanatical Christian extremist agenda, Bush has in essence, as recently pointed out by Senator John Edwards, fallen into the precise trap laid for him by Osama bin Laden.

    Osama bin Laden preached to Islam that the US was set on a Crusade against Islam and uses this to justify the 9/11 attacks. Of course before the 9/11 attacks this was certainly not true. When Bush invaded Afghanistan to get al-Qaeda and their ally, the Taliban, almost all of America and all of the world, including most of the Muslim world, supported it. Why? Because it was an appropriate act against a fanatical enemy that attacked us.

    Then Bush attacked Iraq, one of the nations MOST antagonistic to al-Qaeda. And started picking fights with Iran (also antagonistic to BOTH al-Qaeda AND Iraq) and threw Syria in to boot. By picking fights with the Muslim groups most antagonistic to eachother, and outright calling it a crusade, Bush in essence proved Osama bin Laden right in the eyes of a majority of Muslims. Most Muslims around the world DO think Bush is on a Crusade against Islam, and thus feel sympathetic to Jihad.

    Bush fell into Osama bin Laden's trap. That is why Osama bin Laden is JUST AS EAGER to perpetuate the lie that 9/11 and Iraq are linked as Bush, McCain, Romney, Giuliani, Huckabee, Brownback and Lieberman are. In all these cases, their Crusade/Jihad mentality is only justified to their supporters if this lie is believed.

    Six years ago we were attacked. Six years after Pearl Harbor, America had won what was arguably the most destructive war in human history. We had won decisively. FDR led us from the horror of the attack, through the retooling for war and into the heart of war. Truman led us to the final victory.

    What has Bush done?

    Fundamentalist Extremists are Winning

    As Bush tries to convince us that he is winning his Forever War Against Terror, it is increasingly clear that we are losing the REAL war against fundamentalist extremism throughout the world. As the Taliban and al-Qaeda thrive in Pakistan and Afghanistan, even in Iraq, where we are surging merrily ahead, secularism is dying out and fundamentalist extremism of BOTH Shi'ite and Sunni varieties, thrive.

    I call this the Republican enabling of a growing fundamentalist Caliphate, a concept I introduced more than a year ago (leading to my being asked by BBC radio to be part of a phone in radio program) and has recently been more openly advocated even in Indonesia.

    Recently on Current TV I saw further evidence that we are losing to extremists...even in Iraq where Bush assures us we are winning. Here is a highly disturbing segment from Current TV describing how secular Iraqis are being forced out as refugees, leaving Iraq to be taken over by extremists.




    You can see an even more disturbing aspect of this in another segment on Current TV covering what it is like for students (including women) at Baghdad University. One statistic that stood out to me: 100 professors at Baghdad University have been assassinated during our occupation of Iraq. Think about that. That shows how ineffective we are at providing stability to Iraq.

    You can find this segment on the Current TV website.

    From Bahrain and Bangladesh (both formerly moderate Muslim nations that are seeing a surge of fundamentalism) to Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan (where fundamentalists are increasingly seen as the force of stability) to Iraq itself, the crown jewel of Republican failure, we are losing the hearts and minds of Muslims around the world. And it is fundamentalist groups like the Taliban and al-Qaeda that is winning those hearts and minds...or killing or driving out those hearts and minds they can't win over.

    [NOTE: Salon.com has an article covering similar ground. The evidence is clear...fundamentalist Islam is thriving and moderates are finding it harder and harder to survive]

    The Articles They Don't Want You to See 5

    TERRORISM:

    I got to hear John Edwards live, discussing his plan for counter-terrorism. Here is my take on his speech (mostly positive).


    ENVIRONMENT:

    Well, global warming continues apace...faster than scientists predicted. In fact, right now the Northwest Passage has opened up because of an amazingly fast melting of the Arctic ice. AND they predict a Northeast Passage may open up as well very soon.

    I have been saying this for a year now: we only have 10 years according to the OPTIMISTIC scientists to deal with global warming. I have come to the conclusion that if we keep blindly ignoring the problem, our generation will be branded the biggest fuck ups in human history.


    IMPEACHMENT:

    This got very little mainstream coverage, bit it seems that the National Coalition of American Nuns...yes American NUNS!...are calling for impeachment of Bush and Cheney. Why? It's the values things:

    "The National Coalition of American Nuns is impelled by conscience to call you to act promptly to impeach President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for ... high crimes and misdemeanors," the group wrote in a letter written on behalf of its board members.


    STOLEN ELECTIONS IN AMERICA:

    Dan Rather has done some excellent investigative journalism that should be the talk of America right now. The stolen election of 2000 that brought us the idiot resident of the White House may be even more deliberate than people thought.

    Here's the video of Dan Rather's report on stolen elections.

    And if you are a bit of a Luddite like me, here is the transcript.

    Now I want to focus on someone who might have been one of the key players in the stolen election 2000.

    Tom Feeney:
    Stealing Money and Stealing Elections

    The last 2 weeks I discussed a too-often ignored Congressional race in NY State: NY-13, which pits the pitiful and corrupt Vito Fossella against Steve Harrison. (You can contribute towards winning in NY-13, as well as several other NY State races, by donating at the Daily Gotham Act Blue Site).

    This week I want to focus on a particularly vile corrupt Republican Congressman, Tom Feeney (FL-24).

    Tom Feeney has already been fined by the House ethics committee for his Abramoff connections.

    But there is probably more coming...the FBI is investigating Tom Feeney further for those Abramoff connections. Gee, and the Republicans wanted us to think the Abramoff scandal had blown over.

    And here is a rundown of Tom Feeney's corruption from Beyond DeLay.

    But perhaps the worst he has done is active participation in voting fraud. Tom Feeney has been accused of recruiting computer programmers to write software that could alter vote totals on touch-screen voting machines in Florida.

    And, according to Dan Rather's report, these accusations against Tom Feeney may well be true.

    I plan on doing more about Feeney in the near future. But if Abramhoff fraud and voter fraud are enough for you, you can contribute to defeating "Stolen Election" Feeney (FL-24) (and other Florida races) at this Act Blue Site.


    YOUR RECOMMENDED ARTICLES FROM LAST WEEK:

    Here are some articles that you recommended to me to highlight:

    How to talk to a Climate Skeptic


    MY ARTICLES FROM LAST WEEK: (with minimal comment)

    EVOLUTION:


    Darwin Day Essay I: Evolution Explained


    Darwin Day Essay II: Intelligent Deception

    Darwin Day Essay III: Evolution Defended

    Let me also highlight the Evolution News page on Science Daily.

    I also highly recommend the National Center for Science Education.

    And now is as good a time as any to suggest you look into what Darwin Day events are in your area...and if there aren't any, maybe you want to start one.


    GLOBAL WARMING:

    A brief rundown of the evidence for global warming (with links to data)

    More details about global warming and some solutions,

    An introduction to the Denial Lobby (some of the political info a bit dated).

    The absolute insanity of the Denial Lobby, with a fair amount of detailed scientific evidence highlighted. LOTS of good links.

    More sceintific evidence with links to data on Global Warming,

    Debunking the so-called "Global Warming Swindle."

    A military analysis of Global Warming.

    A good general source on global warming, including solutions, can be found on the Union of Concerned Scientists website.

    And perhaps the best source for info on Global Warming is RealClimate, the place where actual atmospheric scientists go to discuss the issue.


    HIV and AIDS:

    A basic link about HIV

    HIV/AIDS connection

    An essay written by Nobel Prize winner Stanley Prusnier

    NEW YORK STATE FOCUS: NY-25 Congressional Race

    Chris Bowers had an excellent diary on Daily Kos about Dan Maffei running against Jim Walsh in the NY-25 Congressional District. Keep in mind, this is one of the districts that Karl Rove had marked down on his list of most vulnerable Republican seats. This is one of our more likely pickup opportunities for 2008.

    Here is a video introducing Dan Maffei:



    Here are some excerpts from Chris Bowers' Daily Kos diary:

    Here is the situation. Over the past nine months, Jim Walsh has said he was in favor of withdrawal, and then voted a timeline that would actually mandate withdrawal. Even in discussions with local media yesterday, and in calls I made to his staff, he refused to come out in favor of a timetable. Walsh has said that he is in favor of oversight on Iraq, and then voted against oversight. He said he was opposed to the escalation, and then refused to vote against the escalation. In May, he said he was opposed to a blank check for Bush on Iraq, and then voted to give Bush a blank check on Iraq in the capitulation bill. Everything Walsh is saying now, he ha already said before. The key difference is not hat Walsh has changed his opinion, but that Democats in Congress are changing the legislation they are trying to pass through Congress.

    Back in the spring, House Democrats forced votes on stiffer legislation that required real oversight and mandated withdrawal. It only received two votes form Republicans, because the many so-called moderate Republicans who are supposedly against Bush's policy in Iraq are not willing to pass binding legislation opposing Bush's policy in Iraq. They are, however, willing to pass meaningless legislation that suggests Bush should change course, but does not actually require him to do so. For example, Walsh is a co-sponsor of the Kirk-Lipinski bill that does not mandate any troop withdrawal whatsoever, but sets it as a "goal." Compromise bills of this sort are in abundance nowadays, and I imagine Walsh will vote for all of them. However, if a bill comes up that actually mandates troops withdrawal, there is still no indication that he would vote for such a bill. Given everything he has said on the matter, I bet he won't vote for mandated troop withdrawal...

    Supporting Dan Maffei means opposing weak, toothless Iraq legislation in Congress. It means taking a stand against a self-defeating Democratic strategy that will not only do nothing to drawdown the Iraq war, but will also go a long way toward wiping out any chance of a second Democratic wave election. It means supporting more and better Democrats, instead of reverting to the pro-war, minority status Democratic Party of 2002-2003.


    You can donate to help Maffei win (as well as finding other good Democrats running in NY State) on the official Daily Gotham Act Blue Site.

    CALIFORNIA FOCUS: Stealing Elections

    This is a repeat from last week with an update.

    There is a new Republican plot to steal elections. This time aiming to steal electoral votes from California. This comes from a Palm Springs paper:

    On the surface, it sounds good: Electoral votes should be proportional to the popular vote and candidates should have to pay more attention to California if they want to win here. But if a proposed measure that would reallocate California's 55 electoral votes passes, the outcome would fundamentally change how U.S. presidents are elected.

    No one state, not even California, should be able to do that.

    California has more electoral votes than any other state in the union. A ballot measure to reallocate these votes could result in a Republican being elected president each time out, regardless of the popular vote.

    The initiative is a proposed amendment to the state elections code. The fear is that California voters won't realize the unintended consequences until it's too late.

    Make no mistake, this is an attempt to grab votes and make it nearly impossible for a Democrat to become president this election and beyond...

    "It's a Republican effort to lower the electorate vote count for Democrats," New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, Democratic candidate for the presidency, told us at Thursday's Prez on the Rez forum. "It's a political power grab. I strongly oppose it and hope California will wake up to this."


    To my California readers: If this ballot initiative passes, California will win most future elections for the Republicans...and do so against the will of most voters.

    Fight this ill-conceived initiative. Contact the California media and oppose this measure. And tell the California Dem. party that you oppose it.

    And you can read more opinions from other newspapers here.

    When I posted this last week I got a comment defending the initiative and calling for more states to adopt it. I disagree. If this kind of change is done piecemeal, state by state, then it creates disparities that will allow partisan exploitation. The electoral college system was set up as a winner take all system and if we mess with it it should be done across the board in all states. IF this change were made in all 50 states at once, I would not be so opposed to it. But if is done ONLY as a way of manipulating the electoral vote to help one party or the other, then it subverts what the founding fathers envisioned our electoral system to be. As it is being proposed this change is unacceptable and nothing but a further attempt by Republicans to steal elections they can't win fairly.

    MINNESOTA FOCUS: Al Franken on Energy Policy

    [EDITOR'S NOTE: This comes from Maria Energia's blog via Culture Kitchen]

    Originally posted on Maria Energia (http://mariaenergia.blogspot.com) on September 10, 2007

    Comedian, satirist, and former talk show host Al Franken is running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota on the DFL ticket (in MN, the Democratic Party is called the "DFL").

    Last month, Franken made an appearance at the Crow Wing County/Morrison County DFL summer picnic. I grew up in Morrison County, so I attended and was impressed with the (relatively) huge turnout. I met Al, but more importantly he took the time to answer some questions I sent him via email about renewable energy and Minnesota’s role in the clean tech revolution.


    Maria Energia: What specific renewable energy legislation do you want to see implemented at the federal level?

    Al Franken: On a macro level, I'd like to implement a national cap and trade for carbon dioxide. This would make the cleanest renewables cheaper than fossil fuels and reward sequestration of CO2 in the form of planting acreage.

    I'd like to see more federal investment in pilot projects for renewables. Representative Collin Peterson has put in several pilot projects for cellulosic ethanol that would be conducted here in Minnesota.

    When I have said I want an Apollo Program for renewable energy, I'm talking about making these kinds of investments in renewables, including things like tidal and wave power. The United States has to go back to investing in research and development. This means identifying promising technologies and investing in them.

    Maria: How would you open up Minnesota's markets for renewable energy investment?

    Franken: I would refer you to my previous answer.

    Maria: What is Minnesota's biggest renewable energy advantage (i.e. what can we capitalize on in a clean energy revolution)?

    Franken: First of all, we grow a lot of corn, the number one feedstock for ethanol. We also grow a lot of soy, which is the number one feedstock for biodiesel. So, obviously, we have had years of experience making both, and our state universities have been doing a lot of the research.

    Wind is cleaner, and Minnesota is a very windy state. We’re ninth in the nation. We should really be exploiting that more. Also, I think we should reinvigorate our manufacturing base by building wind turbines in Minnesota. So many of the turbines - the mechanisms that turn the spinning blades into electricity - are made in Europe. Let's make them here.

    Cellulosic is only a few years away and we have prairie grasses, which are perennials and have very deep root systems, making them potentially a very sustainable feedstock.

    Right now gasified biomass is being used as fuel in ethanol plants. We got a lot of biomass in many forms; for example, forests, especially in the northeastern part of the state, where we don't have wind. As cellulosic technology develops, there is great potential in using our forests, managed in a sustainable way, to add to our arsenal of renewable energy sources.

    Maria: What is the role of business, government, and consumers in a clean energy future?

    Franken: The government has to find ways of encouraging businesses to make clean energy available and attractive to consumers. Government should take the lead in making green buildings, working in partnership with companies that develop green technologies, and by investing in energy-efficient transportation systems - light rail, commuter rail, etc.

    Obviously, tax incentives should encourage businesses to develop technologies and consumers to buy energy-efficient products. This is one of those things where everybody has to work together because it's in everybody's interest.

    Maria: What steps have you personally taken to fight global warming or make your life more energy efficient?

    Franken: Right now I’m traveling from Duluth to Minneapolis in a hybrid vehicle - my family Ford Escape. I bike to work, when I can. Biking, as Jim Oberstar might say, converts a hydrocarbon economy into a carbohydrate economy. Of course, we recycle.

    But the biggest thing I'm doing is running for the Senate, so that when I get to Washington, I can make sure that the things I wrote about in the first four answers can come to fruition.